Stay Inside During Storms. Unless You Are a Journalist.

This ia a montage of reporters covering Hurricane Sandy from a CNN story.

I present it to you without comment. But I'm interested in your thoughts.

(FYI ... the video originally posted here was removed from YouTube. This one is quite similar.)

Anderson Cooper: In Order to Be a Success, You Need to Outwork Everyone Else.


After Anderson Cooper graduated from Yale University, he had difficulty finding a job in broadcast journalism. So he gathered some video equipment and shuttled off to war zones – Burma, Bosnia and Somalia, among other places, and packaged his own news.

Eventually, he began selling his stories. Then ABC News hired him.

Now, Cooper, who visited Temple University yesterday to receive the Lew Klein Excellence in the Media Award, reports for 60 Minutes, he hosts a daily talk show on CBS and he anchors a show on CNN. He works around 14 to 16 hours per day.

“I don’t do much else,” he said, though he added that the long days don’t bother him. “It doesn’t feel like work to me.”

His style of journalism has generated a mass following, largely because he reports on ideas and events in a factual manner and then adds his own critical eye. He’s received criticism for his brand of journalism, like the time he saved the life of a child who had been pelted by bricks after a devastating earthquake in Haiti.

“This kid is 10-years old and he has a severe head wound,” Cooper recalled, explaining how he scooped up the child and carried him to safety. “Some people attacked me for being too involved. But this was not altering the event. It was helping a kid.”

It’s important not to alter a situation, he said, or to even create a stir because the cameras are rolling. When people start acting for the camera, he shuts it down, as what he strives for is authenticity. Which is why he lets the news impact him on a personal level.

“I don’t think you should go home and brush it (the job) off,” he said. “Seeing everything and thinking about it makes your reporting all the more real.”

Even after 20 years in journalism, after witnessing devastation after devastation, he tries not to be hardened by what he sees and experiences.

“You can get lost in the horror and hate,” he admitted. “But then you miss the kindness and compassion.”


Here are a few other things he said that stood out to me:

• “It’s an extraordinary feeling to run to something that everyone else is running away from,” he said.

• “Accuracy in reporting is more important than ever before,” Cooper said.

• His mother told him to follow his bliss. So he did. He took a chance by travelling overseas to war zones to report.

• He got his first job by being there, and by being aggressive.

• In order to be a success, you need to outwork everyone else, Cooper said.

“That’s why I don’t take vacation now,” he said. “Because I know there are a lot of people waiting to take my job.”

 • He came out as being gay when he was in high school, and he said that he has long been open about his sexuality. He just always thought it was a personal issue, one that didn’t need to be discussed on the global stage of his television shows.

“When you’re reporting,” he said, “you don’t want to be the story.”

Plus, in many of the places he reported, being gay was not socially acceptable.

Having his personal life splashed around the world could have endangered his life.





Is It Good Journalism To Report What You Find on Facebook?

When two wedding parties clashed at a Society Hill hotel and the rumble was caught on video, the story went global. Demand for information was intense.

When the families involved refused to speak, the Philadelphia Daily News went to the social media networks to find information about the two wedding parties. The paper reported that one of the brides' page on Pinterest "shows that she'd been contemplating a wedding with elements of love and beauty, not of violence and death. Photos on the page include a love message from the groom to the bride on her wedding shoe, flowers glued to Styrofoam balls, and the palms of four hands displaying the word F-O-R-E-V-E-R, spelled out in Scrabble tiles and a wedding band for the letter O."

They also published information from people's facebook pages and twitter feeds.

Is this an invasion of privacy? Or, are the media allowed to publish/air information from people's social media sites?

Is this good journalism or lazy reporting?

Is A Person's Criminal Past Newsworthy When They Are The Apparent Victim?

By now you have probably seen the above footage of a woman being punched in the face by a Philadelphia police officer during the after party of the Puerto Rican Day parade.

The woman was charged with disorderly conduct though charges were later dropped. The police officer is on 30-day suspension and the police chief announced that the officer will be fired.

A few days after the incident, the Philly Post - the online component of Philadelphia magazine, reported that the woman punched in the face had a criminal record. She was busted for a DUI and related charges, including falsely identifying herself to police. She was sentenced to 82 days in jail for a theft conviction. And she was busted on a drug charge.

Is the woman's criminal history relevant to the story? Should it be published information?

Or did the Philly Post reporter overstep the boundaries of what a journalist is supposed to report?

Do You Believe What You See On The Interwebs?

Is satire acceptable?

In recent years, there have been many people attempting be humorous in the media ... and they are sometimes taken seriously by other media outlets who perpetuate their satire. But when the other media outlets republish the material, they print it as fact.

Take the image at right, for example (click on it to see it larger). It is a clip from an Iranian news site that doesn't understand, apparently, that The Onion is one big joke.

The Iranian news outlet ran a story about a poll The Onion made up that said, "The overwhelming majority of rural white Americans said they would rather vote for Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad than U.S. president Barack Obama."

In this day and age, when information is accessible immediately almost anywhere, should satire be allowed? Or is it up to the audience to decipher what is the truth?

Should it be the responsibility of the consumer to fact-check the Internet?

Does sature ultimately undermine the credibility of everything you read online?